News for the PPI Conference

    Evaluations FDH conference

    Gregory Engels  10 March 2013 20:47:50

    This are the evaluation results of the participants of the PPI Conference 2011 in Freidrichshafen, Germany

    Overall Scores
    Average Score: 80%
    Number of evals completed: 22
    Comments: The conference was organized with a remarkable efficiency

    The open space was very interesting and a nice idea. Discussions on statutes ammendments should be done more officially though (probably with beamer and splitting the room, just the same as we did for the elections).


    Never ever start a two day conference again at 8:00 on a Sunday morning. Saturday was excellent, Sunday was to hectic due to parallel events.

    great event. super deutch beer and lovely Pirates. but, please, expresso coffee for beginning day is indispensabler fro PP IT !! lol


    Die Location war v├Âllig ├╝berdimenmisioniert. Catering nicht inkl, und das bei diesem Preis. Ohne Worte


    lunches should be envisaged

    It was very well organized. But when you look at the costs it would be very disappointing if it wasn't well organized.


    it would be easier to pay a price that includes an overnight stay and meal


    Openspace was an fantastic experience

    Positive: great communication, talks and exchange with other Pirates Negative: Confusion between the General Assembly as the PPI's highest organ and a generic conference - Open Space during the official part lead to disruption of the Assembly work flow


    Food costs could have been included, at least lunch. Invitation to conference should have included easy ways to get there for people who don't know the area.

    The location was great! so much better then last year, were you had to climb through a toilet to get to the small room... Also it was good that table space was limited, so the people have spent their time communicating in person, instead of staring each into his own laptop.

    Great work from the Board who have organized such a great event as volunteers!
    Board Elections
    Average Score: 71%
    Number of evals completed for session: 18
    Comments: Well organized

    Remote voters were ignored too much.

    The chairman did a good job

    STV was a catastrophe, not suited for the task and insufficiently explained to the participants

    Somewhat un-organized with people running back and forth. More breaks needs to be planned in. Better integration of remote participants, different system than skype?

    The outcome was a catastrophe for PPI - Samir has already began ruining it all. The STV voting method is also very questionable, cause it randomly chose candidates - I don't like the idea of a machine deciding who will be the winner of an election.

    The election method was a mess - it should be changed, as it should not rely on a mere chance
    Closing of the Conference
    Average Score: 80%
    Number of evals completed for session: 16
    Comments: Nice wrap-up, emotional keynote.

    Too bad so many had left early.
    Conference Reopen
    Average Score: 67%
    Number of evals completed for session: 14
    Comments: The second day was a bit unordered (for example the membership fee was announced in the morning but was done much later).

    ?!

    8:00am was way to early - no one was there.

    it was too early, and the most people not disciplined enough to be there on time.
    Discussions on annual fee
    Average Score: 68%
    Number of evals completed for session: 14
    Comments: They were a bit hidden, probably it would have been better to leave them at the beginning.

    Too early, but with remote participation quite interesting.
    Keynote - Why Are You Here
    Rick Falkvinge
    Average Score: 92%
    Number of evals completed for session: 20
    Comments: Very emotional and touching

    Very emotional, perhaps a bit too much. Still for the event the perfect closing keynote!

    Very impressive, it was hard not to start crying :p

    arrr

    Fantastic

    Good, emotional. Addressing everyone

    Thank you Rick!
    Official discussions on statutes amendments
    Average Score: 69%
    Number of evals completed for session: 15
    Comments: They were not "official enough".

    In front of the beamer and applying the rules of procedure and it's perfect. Idea to not force everyone to participate should be applied next conference again!

    It was excellent that it was done in a small round, without interfering with all those who had fun in the meantime.

    Excellent Idea to move it to an extra session, so it does not bore to death all who is not interested.
    Open Space Conference - Day 1
    Average Score: 81%
    Number of evals completed for session: 18
    Comments: Participation was hight, the results surprised me. Only the introduction was too long.

    Open Space was an incredible waste of time which won't deliver any results. This is not a good Idea for an international meeting.

    Too much time spent on introduction of the concept of open space workshops.

    very good. Only bad part was spaces outside of room a bit hard for people to find.

    The preparation was excellent! The introduction to the OS was a little bit over-esoteric - the strange colored cloth in the middle of the room was... strange. Other than that, it was excellent. The People who arrived late had not easily got into the flow of the others, something could be done here, perhaps.

    Open Space is great! We should do more of it.
    Open Space Conference - Day 2
    Average Score: 67%
    Number of evals completed for session: 18
    Comments: Probably one day would have been enough (we were a bit run out of ideas). If you announce the open space earlier people could think of more topics.

    Due to lack of participants not as good as on Saturday. Don't start at 08:00!

    Open Space was an incredible waste of time which won't deliver any results. This is not a good Idea for an international meeting.

    Good concept but crashing with important PPI issues. No time to attend Open Space

    it has not really worked to have it in parallel with the official sessions... and it was to early - there was no one there at 8am.
    Opening of the conference
    Average Score: 77%
    Number of evals completed for session: 11
    Comments: ?!

    warm welcome
    Piraten-Streaming
    Wolfgang Preiss
    Average Score: 86%
    Number of evals completed for session: 16
    Comments: Remote voters loved it!

    Wolfgang did a great job as usual!:)

    Some mic problems but excellent service for remote viewers! Very needed. Should have been marketed better

    Wolfgang did a fantastic job
    Presentation of candidates for membership of PPI
    Average Score: 79%
    Number of evals completed for session: 19
    Comments: Very good that it was at the beginning!

    Participation of remote voters made it very interesting, showing that while we are 1000 of km apart, we have the same goals and ideas.

    Good about candidates present but remote candidates needed at least short summary of why they would be good to be read up.

    Was very well organized.

    This was great
    Reports (Board and Lay Auditors)
    Average Score: 71%
    Number of evals completed for session: 15
    Comments: Due to a late start too rushed. Also reports were not well prepared (mine included).

    I guess the auditors did their best, but it got overshadowed by the immense fail of not having backups of the administration. A busfactor of one concerning finances is unacceptable. Good to know we have placed a fix for this now.

    A common (possibly written) statement on last year's activities from the board might be a good idea.

    Thanks to the old Board for this conference!
    Social Event organized by PP-DE-RV
    Average Score: 75%
    Number of evals completed for session: 20
    Comments: Very unfriendly service, not enough space. We ended up in another restaurant.

    The place was to cramped and unfriendly. And they have thrown us out, cause they didn't liked Pirates!
    Social Event organized by PWB
    Average Score: 79%
    Number of evals completed for session: 22
    Comments: I thought PWB paid for (donated) the food, but had to pay myself. Perhaps this should have been more clear.

    Expensive...

    Nice place. maybe a little too expensive.
    Voter Accreditation
    Average Score: 77%
    Number of evals completed for session: 18
    Comments: The name-tags looked awful.


    Comments Disabled